Supreme Court to decide on patent protections for software By Lawrence Hurley
Alice asks Supreme Court for CBM clarity By World Intellectual Property Review
The Further Adventures Of Alice By James Nurton
Alice Pushes Back on Prometheus: The Continuing Saga of Patent-Eligible Methods By Kaplan IP Law
Patent court further muddies the software patent waters By Kevin Cukierski and William J. Lenz
Is the Federal Circuit’s CLS Bank v. Alice Corp . Decision a Cry for Help from the Supreme Court? By Michael L. Kiklis and James Love
United States: A Method For Distributing Copyrighted Products Over The Internet Does Not Lack Subject Matter Eligibility By Esther H. Lim
The Importance of Claim Language in Determining Patent Eligibility By Robert R. Sachs
Rader’s Olive Branch: Ultramercial II Resolves the Judicial Deadlock of CLS Bank By Robert R. Sachs
United States: Fractured Court Holds Computer-Implemented System, Method, And Computer-Readable Media Claims Invalid Under 35 U.S.C. § 101 By James A. Cooke
What Is Next for Software Patents? By Christopher G. Wolfe, Charles D. Holland and Mark G. Knedeisen
Dissenting Opinions in CLS Bank International v. Alice Corp. By Christopher M. Hall
A Method for Distributing Copyrighted Products over the Internet Does Not Lack Subject Matter Eligibility By Boris Lau, Cheng Xu
Ultramercial Revisited: Rader Throws Down the Gauntlet on Patent-Eligibility of Computer-Implemented Inventions* By Eric W. Guttag
Does the Myriad Decision Constitute a 5th Amendment Taking? By Dale B. Halling
The Supreme Court's Myriad Decision: Where Does It Leave the "Inventive Concept" Test? By Grantland Drutchas
Twenty Thoughts on the Importance of Myriad By Dennis Crouch
Breyer's Reinvention of the 'Inventive Concept' By Robert R. Sachs
CLS Bank v. Alice Corp.: a new hermeneutic of suspicion By Nelson R. Capes
Nation of Laws? By Dale B. Halling
False Distinctions Between Hardware and Software Patents are Not the Answer By Eric Gould Bear
Patent Claims and the Use of Abstractions By Robert R. Sachs
Is 35 USC 101 Judged by the Claims? By Dale B. Halling
The Broader Meanings of the CLS Bank Decision By Kevin E. Noonan
The Normative Stance of Patent Eligibility By Robert R. Sachs
USPTO: No Change to Software Patentability Evaluation By Gene Quinn
Is 35 USC 101 Judged by the Claims?: CLS Bank v. Alice Corp CAFC en banc decision: Nation of Men By Dale B. Halling
Down the Rabbit Hole By The Patent Hawk
A Letter from the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit to the United States Supreme Court By by Stephen Jenei
CLS Bank Int'l v. Alice Corp. (Fed. Cir. 2013) (en banc) -- Judge Lourie's Concurrence By Michael Borella
What Happened to Judge Lourie in CLS Bank v. Alice Corp? By Sue D. Nym
CLS v. Alice: The Federal Circuit at a Jurisprudential Deadlock By Robert R. Sachs
The Alice in Wonderland En Banc Decision by the Federal Circuit in CLS Bank v. Alice Corp By John Kong
Federal Circuit Nightmare in CLS Bank v. Alice Corp. By Gene Quinn
Muddled Software Patent Law Gives No Guidance, Experts Say By Ryan Davis
Rader Regrets CLS Bank Impasse, Comments on Latest Patent Reform Bill By Tony Dutra
Software Development and the Use of Abstractions By Robert R. Sachs
Why Section 101 is Neither a "Condition of Patentability" nor an Invalidity Defense By Professor David Hricik
Applying Can Openers to Real World Problems: The Failure of Economic Analysis Applied to Software Patents By Robert R. Sachs
Prometheus Unbound I: The Untethering of Laws of Nature and Patent Eligibility from Scientific Reality By Robert R. Sachs, Jennifer R. Bush
Is There Life After Bilski? Yes, but It’s Not as We Know It: A Response to Michael Risch By Robert R. Sachs
Patent Eligibility: The Historical Cases By Robert R. Sachs
Turning the red tape tide Remarks given by Andrew G Haldane, Executive Director, Financial Stability and member of the Financial Policy Committee
Futurization of Swaps Commentary by Darrell Duffie, Professor of Finance, Graduate School of Business, Stanford University
